And the photos themselves:

Just bouncing around my neighborhood, keeping my eyes peeled for the odd & beautiful.

There’s a treat at the end for the patient viewers. That’s not a gimmick to get people to watch my video — these clips are all presented chronologically, so when I got the last shot, I went home. It’s like they say: your keys are always in the last place you think to look.

Shot with my schmancy new Nikon D90, through various lenses (Tamron 28-300 VC, Nikon 70-300 + Canon 500D closeup, Nikon 18-70, Tamron 18-250).

Music: Cyro Baptista – Ama

These last two cameras, the S50c and the S51c, seem to finally cut the computer out of the equation. Again, though, it looks like Nikon have gotten close to a good thing, but failed. Here’s where the camera-to-Flickr system falls short:

• Flipping through the uploading options & menus on the camera itself, you find no mention of Flickr. Turns out that there simply is no direct uploading to Flickr. Go back & look at all of Nikon’s promo material for the camera, and you find out that they never use the term “direct.” You can eventually upload your pictures to Flickr, sure, but it takes you sitting down at the computer manually uploading them. What’s new here, right?
• The only place you can upload your photos is mypicturetown.com. The website itself is better than their previous photo-hosting attempts (Coolpix Connect, Coolpix Connect 2), but it’s still a joke. It uses a horrid frame-based layout that doesn’t fit on any size monitor. It looks like it only works on Internet Explorer. Firefox throws up a “Missing Plugin” message, without any suggestion as to what is actually missing.
• From that page, you can highlight photos (or albums) & tap the ‘Flickr’ button, which fairly painlessly moves copies of the images over to your Flickr page. It takes forever, which is crazy. The files are shooting from one webserver to another; it should be nearly instant.
• Especially because it doesn’t even give Flickr the full image! It uploads a terrible 1024×768 100kb version of the file to Flickr. That’s even if you’ve put the full 8 megapixel 3mb file on mypicturetown. I find this completely absurd. Flickr has unlimited storage space (for Pro members), while mypicturetown gives you 20gb total (not per month) and it’s 50% more expensive than Flickr Pro. There’s no way to order enlargements from mypicturetown, while there is from Flickr. Hmm… Where do you think the full-rez 3mb files belong?
• The Flickr version of the file is completely stripped of its embedded EXIF data. So there’s no note saying “Taken with a Nikon S51c,” which seems like a glaring exclusion, since this is the famous Flickr-uploading camera & all. It means that the Nikon-sponsored Camera finder page on Flickr will not include your photos in their database, and nobody will know that you paid extra cash for the camera that uploads to Flickr.
• The missing EXIF also means that “Taken on” dates are completely messed up. Photos say that they were taken at the moment they were tranferred from mycameratown to Flickr, and on top of that — they arrive out of order.

So to summarize, here’s what it takes to put your photos online with the S51c:

• snap photos
• plug in camera to recharge, which automatically uploads the files to mypicturetown
• wait, or go to bed
• sign on to mypicturetown
• select the keepers of the bunch
• press the ‘Flickr’ button
• wait again

As compared to the process with normal cameras:

• snap photos
• plug in camera to computer, or card into card reader
• select the keepers of the bunch
• drag them into the Flickr Uploadr program & press Upload
• wait, or go to bed

I honestly don’t see how the wireless fundamentally makes life any easier here. In my fantasy-land, here’s how the camera would operate:

• snap photos
• plug in camera to recharge, which automatically uploads the files to Flickr
• wait, or go to bed

Or in the case of normal people who value their privacy and use their computers as the primary storage site for their photos, substitute that middle step for “automatically downloads to your computer.” But sadly, those options will have to wait till 6 months from now when Nikon replace the S51c (and assumedly start their fourth photo-hosting site).

Now you might think, “Ben, quit nitpicking & go take pictures!” Well, I did, and as it turns out, the camera’s performance & picture quality are both far below average. Very long shutter lag, slow startup time, slow-response menus, low-quality optics, grainy pictures even in good light… Should I go on?

http://animoto.com/play/3f9ff…

Fri, May 18, 4-10pm
Sat, May 19, 4-11pm
Murphy Hill Gallery
3333 W Arthington St
Chicago, IL 60624

And if you can’t make it, or if you simply want a sneak peak at the work I’m showing, here are a few that I’m picking from.

I constantly tell folks at the camera store that the universal rule is “if it fits in your pocket, the image quality won’t ever approach the SLRs.” This will probably be the first real exception to that rule.